Media code of ethics in Poland

 

In Poland associations of journalists and some broadcasters have their own ethical codes (e.g. The journalist ethic code of the Polish Association of Journalists or The principles of journalist ethics of TVP SA). However, Media Ethic Charter is the most important document of press deontology in Poland. In 1995 it was accepted by all journalist associations, but also by some broadcasters³ organisations (e.g. Union of the Press Publishers /Unia Wydawcow Prasy/ and Polish Public Radio and Television). The Charter consists only of 7 principles such as:

·        THE PRINCIPLE OF THE TRUTH - which means that journalists, editors, producers and broadcasters do their best so that the conveyed information reflects the truth; they report the facts in their proper context, and in case of publicising a false information they immediately correct it.

·        THE PRINCIPLE OF OBJECTIVITY - which means that the author depicts the reality independently of his/her own views, reports reliably different points of view.

·        THE PRINCIPLE OF DIVISION OF THE INFORMATION AND THE COMMENTARY - which means that the message is constructed in such a way that it is possible for the recipient to distinguish facts from views and opinions.

·        THE PRINCIPLE OF HONESTY - which means acting in accordance with one's own conscience and the good of the recipient, not submitting oneself to the influence, incorruptibility, refusing to act against one's beliefs.

·        THE PRINCIPLE OF RESPECT AND TOLERANCE - i.e. respect for human dignity, rights, personal property, and especially for privacy and good name.

·        THE PRINCIPLE OF SUPERIORITY OF RECIPIENT'S GOOD - which means that the basic rights of readers, viewers and listeners are superior to the interests of the editorial staff, journalists, editors, producers and broadcasters.

·        THE PRINCIPLE OF FREEDOM AND RESPONSIBILITY - which means that freedom of the media imposes on journalists, editors, producers and broadcasters responsibility for the form and content of the message and the consequences which result from it.

International comparative studies show that orders and bans represented in the Media Ethic Charter are of limited character as compared to those which are very often included in various European codes. The Charter, for example, does not include such crucial principles as the prohibition to discriminate others as regards race, nationality, religion, sex, background, etc.; the prohibition to use one³s profession to gain personal profits; the prohibition of any kind of plagiarism; restricting oneself to honest methods of gathering information; protecting information sources; separating advertisements from editorial/journalist texts; the principle of alleged innocence; or the principle of trade solidarity (integration).

Media Ethic Council

In the middle of the 1990s, there was a project of the Press Law whose aim was to establish the Media Council, which would have similar authority as the National Radio and Television Broadcasting Council (KRRiT)  (i.e. it would control the press market in Poland). However, the journalists and editors were against this project, and decided to establish the Polish Media Conference at the beginning of 1995, which was joined by all important journalists³ and editors³ associations. Soon the Media Ethic Council (Rada Etyki Mediow) was established, which was authorised to make announcements and statements. It took 18 months to choose the members of the Council, because it had been settled that they should be chosen anonymously. The first members of the Council included: Magdalena Bajer, Tomasz Goban-Klas, Boleslaw Michalek, Krzysztof Piesiewicz, Michal Radgowski, Jerzy Turowicz and Piotr Wojciechowski. In the second term of office (since October 1997) the Council included: Magdalena Bajer, Jozefa Hennelowa, Tomasz Goban-Klas, Piotr Wojciechowski, Michal Boguslawski, Cezary Gawrys, Jacek Kurczewski, Tadeusz Kononiuk, Maciej Lukasiewicz.

The Council has troubles with gaining prestige, as its critical statements do not have any relevant influence. Those who criticise the Council³s activity point out that political and social preferences of its members do not allow the Council to act effectively. It happens also that, a member of the Council declares votum separatum as regards its announcements, which additionally weakens its authority. The critics also emphasise that the Council makes statements about minor matters or gives its standpoint about obvious matters instead of taking a stand on matters  which are really essential for the functioning of the media in Poland (e.g. on accusations that public television is biased and that publicistic programmes are highly political).